Terror ferdinand von schirach inhalt

On Monday night ns German public vote on a contentious air security issue: must soldiers it is in allowed zu shoot under passenger planes to save more people on die ground? die question was posed in a movie, notfall a referendum.

Du schaust: Terror ferdinand von schirach inhalt


*


It"s a nightmare scenario: terrorists hijack a commercial airliner with 164 civilization on board und threaten to crash it into a football stadium filled v 70,000 fans. After several unsuccessful tries to force the pläne to land, a German soldier ultimately shoots it down, killing everyone on board yet saving tens des thousands des other lives.

That was the - fictional - jump-off point zum the movie "Terror - your Verdict," i m sorry aired in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Slovakia und the Czech Republic on Monday night. The film is based on a play von German crime writer und defense lawyer Ferdinand by Schirach. It covers the trial von Lars Koch, the jet pilot who made ns fateful decision to shoot down die passenger plane, played in the TV movie über popular German actor Florian david Fitz. Audiences lakers his angry statement und hear impassioned speeches from die defense und the prosecution.

Here"s die movie"s trailer an German:


The twist come at the end: nur like ns theater audiences who went to seen "Terror," TV viewers gott to vote on die verdict tonnage night. After the summations, they can call bei or vote online - und the results were overwhelmingly clear. In Germany, 86.9 percent des participants voted zum innocent, saying that ns soldier had actually made the right decision. Only 13.1 percent voted for guilty und were an favor of kochen going to prison zum murder.

"I think die unusual format worked exceptionally well," stefan Hansen from die Institute des Security policy at the University of kiel told deutsche Welle. "This social issue deals with usual values und the safety von the population, deshalb it"s extremely essential that our society looks into this topic and deliberates the - and with massive media freundin reach more people than in any other way."

Contentious air security law

The question von what kommen sie do v a hijacked plane has been on die German political tagesordnungspunkt for fünfzehn years. After ns attacks von September 11, 2001, German politicians wanted a legislation that safeguarded Germany from similar events wherein terrorists supplied commercial airplanes together weapons. The "Luftsicherheitsgesetz," or air security law, was passed bei early 2005. An Article 14, it said that as a last resort, the bundeswehr could shoot under a passenger planen if the was ns only way zu save much more lives in the event von a terrorist attack.


*

What would happen if terrorists actually hijacked a German passenger plane? Legally, the bewaffnete kräfte wouldn"t be allowed kommen sie shoot the down.


But nur a year later, Germany"s highest court, the Constitutional Court, understood this certain article invalid because it violated die rule the the bewaffnete kraft should never ever take action inside of Germany.

The political leaders who had actually filed the complaint against die air safety and security law so said weighing human leben against each various other - the lives of ns people ~ above the pläne versus those that could be saved on ns ground - would certainly demean person dignity. This in turn would certainly violate the German Constitution, whose zuerst article zu sein "Human dignity shall be inviolable. Kommen sie respect und protect the shall be ns duty des all zustand authority."

Air safety ausblüten a hot-button issue

So shooting down a plane like fictitious soldier Lars kochen did in the "Terror" movie und play zu sein clearly rechtswidrig - and yet almost 87 percent von viewers to be sympathetic to his course of action. Importantly, results an Austria and Switzerland were an in similar way clear.

Mehr sehen: Nikosia Bvb Live Stream - Olympiakos Nicosia Live Stream, Fixtures On Tv

One von those bei favor des "innocent" zu sein Germany"s previous defense minister Franz-Josef Jung. The conservative politician from angela Merkel"s cdu has formerly said the he would ausblüten order die shooting of a hijacked planen even though ns Constitutional Court asserted this ungesetzlich if that was ns only way to keep more civilians safe. He reaffirmed that position in a conversation public broadcaster ARD aired after the movie.

6.31 million Germans watched that discussion - an enormous number zum a political speak show, which reflects that the topic is still very viel relevant. Ns "Terror" movie even attracted 6.88 million viewers, a number that ist much greater than what weeknight programming commonly achieves in Germany. One point that makes the issue dafür interesting ist its ambiguity.


*

The TV discussion about air safety that followed the movie gott heated quickly


"There is no ideal or wrong through this question," Hansen said. "Both perspectives oase good rational and moral arguments." Hansen included that that didn"t seen the movie"s jet pilot together guilty because he action selflessly and wanted kommen sie protect ns lives und the dignity des the thousands of people an the football stadium.

"The Constitution is smarter than us"

Former jet pilot thomas Wassermann also doesn"t blame fictitious pilot Lars Koch. Wassermann claims it zu sein a travesty that politicians deserted jet pilots with die shoot-or-don"t-shoot decision after the Constitutional Court had nixed short article 14 of the air safety and security law. The believes that die law together it stands heute does notfall reflect the terrorism threat Germany faces in 2016.

"The constitution wasn"t carved into a mountain von God," Wassermann said.

Former German interior minister Gerhart baum from die liberal fdp opposes this idea. He was among those who had actually complained about die original air security law in 2005 and fought hard zu make it illegal sein to shoot plane out von the sky to save various other innocent lives.

Baum was certain bei his id that ns fictional pilot in "Terror" was guilty.

Mehr sehen: Warum Darf Ein Vikar Heiraten ? Wo Es In Der Kirche Verheiratete Priester Gibt

"The Constitution ist smarter 보다 us," ns former internal minister said. "We have to stick to it." die German publicly obviously doesn"t agree v him.